I learnt a new word today - cartellian. A collective for the libertarian bunch in the Indian blogosphere.
I read this pearl of wisdom from a member of this cartel.
I think Tejal should set an example for the rest of us in ‘depreviledging’ systems by opening access to her arsehole. Everyone from Thakurs to Dalits to whites to blacks to barnyard animals to illegal Bangladeshi immigrants should be able to enter it at will. I see no reason why everyone should be a have-not when it comes to anal sex with Tejal, especially when she herself has the ability to make everyone a have.
Besides being extremely offensive to women and ridiculing one of the most egregious crimes (violence against women) that exist today, do I even need to say what is wrong with this argument? He is comparing the argument for opening up _public_ institutes to that of access to something very private and personal to a person.
Now we all have rights over our private property and who gets access to it. Which is probably the reason why the cartel is the most insistent on privatisation... To shut off the access to the "undeserving".
Libertarianism and private property rights and privatisation. see how easily they all fit together.
But I am simplifying things, arn't I? And I do not get it, do I?
PS. Incredibly, this post went into draft mode!
I think I accidentally pressed the "save as draft" button when editing this post..
, , ,